Comparison between Electoral Systems and Movement Organising Essay

Comparison between Electoral Systems and Movement Organising - Essay ExampleThis essay discusses thatusing peoples power has positive aspects such as the appeal of having the masses in support of the change they need. When the masses are in solidarity in demanding for a situation action from the government, there is much more international attention focussed on the situation that forces the concerned parties in authority to take appropriate actions to crystalise the situation. Moreover, when the people act in solidarity to demand change, they have much more strength and motivation to see it done.This paper declares that the negative aspects of peoples power are that it rat lead to violence resulting in injuries or even loss of lives. In some cases, it leads to a prolonged instability in the region or res publica affected. An example of the case where the peoples power took control was in the Arab revolution in Egypt when the Egyptians rose against the then regime of President Hos ni Mubarak. The Egyptian protests mainly concerned governmental issues and legal issues that they claimed to treat them poorly. After they had succeeded to over through President Hosni, there were political reforms, even though instability remains a big gainsay to date.The number of registered voters who vote usually reduces under any normal circumstance. Movement building can be used to improve on the voter kit more conveniently than the electoral system. Usually when the masses participate in demonstrations such as the peoples power, the struggling communities take a large part in the participation.